These Are The Worst Baby Food Brands In America According To Class Actions


Overview of the Baby Food Class Actions:

  • Who: Class action lawsuits and recalls have recently affected a number of baby food brands, including Gerber, Plum Organics, Beech-Nut and Similac, among others.
  • Why: Claims against baby food products range from toxic heavy metal content to claims that they are mislabeled and falsely advertised.
  • Or: Class action lawsuits and recalls against baby food products have taken place nationwide.

Choosing something to eat is perhaps never more important than when it comes to deciding what to feed your baby or infant.

Baby food products come in a variety of different formulas and with a number of claims related to how they will improve or maintain your child’s health.

Despite this, baby food is a common target for class action lawsuits with claims ranging from false advertising and mislabeling to unsafe and contaminated ingredients, among others.

With that in mind, TCA takes a look at the baby food brands that recent class action lawsuits and the consumers behind them say make them the worst in America:

Toxic heavy metals report leads to slew of consumer complaints

A swarm of class action lawsuits was filed last year after a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee published a report in February revealing the presence of toxic heavy metals in a number of popular baby foods.

The subcommittee found that baby foods from some of the country’s most popular and prominent brands, including Beech-Nut, Earth’s Best Organic, Gerber, HappyBABY, Parent’s Choice, Plum Organics and Sprout Foods, were contaminated with toxic heavy metalssuch as cadmium, arsenic, lead and mercury.

Plum Organics was one company that came under fire following the report, with a class action lawsuit alleging it did not disclose that her baby food product contained high levels of toxic heavy metals.

Plum, as well as Campbell Soup Co., which sold the brand in May last year, failed to attempt to dismiss the complaint in December.

In September, meanwhile, Gerber faced allegations that broken public trust by failing to disclose that her baby food was contaminated with toxic heavy metals.

Baby food manufacturers occupy a special position of public trust. Consumers think they wouldn’t sell unsafe baby products,” the class action lawsuit said.

Also in September, Nurture Inc., the maker of Happy Baby Organics, faced 17 separate class action lawsuits over the presence of toxic heavy metals. combined into one by a federal judge in New York.

Consumers have claimed to have been personally harmed by consuming allegedly unsafe baby food manufactured and sold by Nurture.

Nurture was also involved in a separate class action lawsuit, filed in June, alleging the company, along with Whole Foods and Target, sold Happy Tot brand baby food containing dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals.

The congressional subcommittee report also led to an April investigation by the New York Attorney General’s office into a potential arsenic contamination in baby food made from rice cereal from the baby food manufacturer.

Later, in June, Beech-Nut announced a recall for its single grain rice cereal product after it was found to contain more inorganic arsenic than allowed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Baby food consumers cry foul with false ads and claims of mislabeling

Consumers have also recently targeted baby food brands with claims of false and misleading advertising.

Last month, a class action lawsuit against Sprout Foods Inc. alleged that the company sells illegally and falsely some of its baby food products are healthier than other brands for children under 2 years old. The complaint claims that Sprout circumvented FDA regulations by labeling its products with nutrient content claims for children under 2 years old.

Also last month, a consumer filed a class action lawsuit against Enfamil in which he argued that the company falsely advertises its baby food products as being “milk-based”.

Consumer Cecilia Martinez claims that despite being marketed, the primary ingredient in Enfamil’s baby food products is actually corn syrup solids.

Meanwhile, in December, a consumer claimed that Gerber was falsely advertising its baby food products as being “Non-GMO”.

Complainant Faith Norman claims that Gerber’s baby food actually contains genetically modified organisms, in addition to other artificial ingredients.

Potential for adverse health effects prompts baby food recalls

A number of baby food product recalls linked to the potential for adverse health effects have also occurred recently.

This month, the FDA expanded an earlier recall for certain Abbott Nutrition’s Similac brand baby formulas that were found to be possibly be contaminated with cronobacter.

The FDA originally announced a recall on February 17 for certain Similac, Alimentum and EleCare baby formulas.

The expanded recall follows the death of a second baby who had consumed Similac PM 60/40 formula and subsequently contracted a fatal cronobacter sakazakii infection.

Similac and Enfamil infant formulas are also being investigated to determine if they cause in newborns or premature babies develop necrotizing enterocolitis.

Meanwhile, in January, Moor Herbs announced that it was recalling its Angel formula for infants after discovering that it contained levels of iron, potassium and sodium that exceeded the maximum allowed amount. Additionally, Moor revealed that the infant formula did not contain vitamin D, which could lead to deficiency, the company said.

Dating back to June of last year, the FDA warned in a recall notice that Designed by Nature of California brand goat’s milk and other powdered baby formula had not been properly tested and lacked the nutrients infants need.

The FDA wrote in its recall notice that Designed further failed to inform parents that its products were not intended for infants under 12 months of age, potentially misleading them.

Failure to meet FDA requirements was also at the center of an August recall of baby food products sold under brands owned by European company Able Group. The FDA recall, which included baby food brands HiPP, Bioland and Kendamil, was launched after the agency discovered that they did not contain enough iron according to US standards.

Have you purchased any of the baby food products listed above? Let us know in the comments!

If you are the parent of a child 5 years of age or younger who developed a disorder after eating baby food, you may be eligible for a free claim review (links to paid lawyer content).

Learn more about class actions and class action settlements:

We tell you about the money you can claim EVERY WEEK! Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a source of legal information that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug-related injury lawsuits, and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not handle claims and we cannot advise you on the status of a class action settlement claim. You should contact the Settlement Administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding the status of your claim, the Claim Form, or questions about when payments should be mailed.

Similar Items

Source link


Comments are closed.