Sprout class action alleges mislabeling of baby food

(Photo credit: Oksana Kuzmina/Shutterstock)

Overview of the Sprout Baby Food Class Action:

  • WHO: Two plaintiffs have filed a false advertising class action lawsuit against Sprout Foods Inc.
  • Why: Sprout is unlawfully displaying certain nutritional content claims on some of its baby food products, according to the lawsuit.
  • Or: The class action lawsuit was filed in federal court in California.

Sprout Foods Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging it deceptively marketed its Sprout-branded baby and toddler food products to convince parents that the products are healthier for children under 2 years of age than products competitors.

Based on this marketing, plaintiffs Gillian Davidson and Samuel Davidson claim to have paid a premium for Sprout baby food products.

The Sprout class action lawsuit points to more than two dozen Sprout baby food products that are allegedly intended for children under 2 years old. Many of the products listed are baby food “pouches” containing pureed baby food.

In 2018, these Sprout baby food packages accounted for 25% of baby food sales in the United States, according to the misleading advertising class action lawsuit.

Sprout Class Action Claims Baby Food Products Are Illegally Mislabeled

Despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) explicitly prohibiting certain nutrient content claims from foods intended for children under 2, Sprout products include important nutrition claims on their labels, according to the class action.

As an example, the plaintiffs cite Sprout “Power Pak” baby food pouches which state on the front label that they contain “3g protein, 5g fiber and 300mg omega-3 of Chia ALA”. The packaging would also state that the product is for children aged “12 months and over”.

In California, a mislabeled food product cannot legally be manufactured, distributed, sold, advertised, or possessed in the state.

“Mislabeled products have no economic value and are legally worthless,” the lawsuit alleges.

Sprout baby food labeling is illegal, misleading, misleading, lawsuit alleges

The Sprout class action claims that the advertising and labeling of Sprout baby food products are illegal, misleading and misleading.

“These claims deceive and mislead reasonable consumers into believing that the products will provide more benefit than their competitors and induce parents to purchase the products despite the lack of evidence that increased nutrient intake is appropriate or recommended for infants and toddlers under 2 years of age,” according to the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs each claim that they purchased Sprout baby food products because they felt they were superior for the nutrition of their children. If the products hadn’t been illegally and misleadingly labeled, they say they wouldn’t have bought them or paid so much for them.

They filed the Sprout class action lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of people in California who have purchased Sprout baby food products since February 18, 2018.

In 2021, Sprout Foods faced a class action lawsuit alleging it mislabeled its baby food products as “organic” and “healthy” when they contained dangerous levels of toxic metals.

You can be eligible for a review of the request for prosecution if you have a child who has consumed Sprout baby food and has been diagnosed with autism, another neurological disorder, or cognitive impairment (links to paid content for lawyers).

Plaintiffs are represented by Seth A. Safier, Marie A. McCrary and Hayley Reylolds of Gutride Safier LLP

the Sprout Baby Food Class Action East Gillian Davidson, et al. against Sprout Foods Inc.Case No. 4:22-cv-01050, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Learn more about class actions and class action settlements:

We tell you about the money you can claim EVERY WEEK! Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a source of legal information that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug-related injury lawsuits, and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not handle claims and we cannot advise you on the status of a class action settlement claim. You should contact the Settlement Administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding the status of your claim, the Claim Form, or questions about when payments should be mailed.

Similar Items

Sprout class action alleges mislabeling of baby food

Similac, Alimentum, EleCare Formula Recall Class Action Investigation

Baby formula maker Abbott hit with class action lawsuit amid reports of infant hospitalizations and deaths

Children’s accessories and toys recalled in the United States due to numerous safety risks

Enfamil Class Action Claims Formula Falsely Advertised as ‘Milk-Based’

Toxic Baby Food | Autism and other disorders lawsuit review

Plum Organics faces class action lawsuit alleging toxic baby food

Recall check: Herbal formulas recalled due to excessive levels of sodium, iron, potassium and lack of vitamin D

Gerber Class Action Claims Company falsely advertises its baby food as ‘GMO-free’

Plum, Campbell ask judge to dismiss toxic heavy metal baby food class action

Parents oppose Plum Organic’s attempt to dismiss class action lawsuit that claims company sold baby food containing toxic heavy metals

Court to reconsider partial dismissal of Graco booster seat class action lawsuit

Similac Pro-Advance infant formula not as similar to human breast milk as claimed, class action claims

Judge grants class certification in harmful orthodontic pacifier combination

Judge transfers Gerber Toxic Metal Baby Food lawsuit to Virginia

Procter & Gamble Pampers ‘Pure’ baby diapers are mostly petrochemical, not plant-based, claim class action lawsuit

Recall Check: MaryRuth Infant Liquid Probiotic Sold at Target, Amazon Recalled for Microorganism Contamination

Gerber baby food contains dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals, class action lawsuit says

Huggies Diaper Lawsuit Most Recent Baby Products Class Action, But 5 Others Top List For Biggest Settlements

Gerber broke public trust by selling baby food containing high levels of toxic heavy metals, class action claims

Source link


Comments are closed.