‘Misleading’ baby food labels confuse parents into thinking products are healthier than they are, experts warn
- Glasgow researchers looked at more than 700 baby food products on sale in the UK
- They found that more than half had marketing claims that could mislead parents.
- The authors said rules should be established to help new parents make healthy choices
New parents are warned to beware of “misleading” marketing tactics used by baby food manufacturers.
Promotional material on product packaging confuses parents and fuels childhood obesity, experts say.
The wording is largely unregulated and often involves indirect health benefits, known as the “healthy halo effect”.
Some products described as having “vegetable tastes” may indeed contain a higher proportion of fruit which is naturally sweeter.
Wording such as “no added sugar” could also mislead parents into believing the items are completely sugar-free, it is feared.
Researchers at the University of Glasgow analyzed 724 baby foods – aimed at infants up to 12 months – sold by Aldi, Amazon, Asda, Lidl, Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Waitrose and Morrisons.
It comes as the UK baby food market is booming, growing at 2.5% a year, with the market expected to reach £1 billion by 2024.
But experts say the absence of any legally binding regulations for the composition and promotion of manufactured baby food means the market is ‘something free for all’.
The survey, published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood, found that baby food products sold in the UK had a total of 6,265 promotional claims, with an average of nine per product. Some wore up to 17.
A survey of baby food sold in the UK has revealed a number of worrying trends in how it’s being promoted, leading the authors to say new parents are facing a free-for-all.
The top composition claim was “organic”, nutrition claims were mostly about “no added sugar” or “less” sugar, and the most common health claim was about the role of iron in supporting development normal cognitive.
More than half of the articles referenced nutritional benefits, with claims of “no added” or “less” sugar and/or salt present in almost 60%.
Claims of baby-directed weaning, where babies are given food to eat themselves rather than from a spoon, were found on 72% of baby snacks, such as food bars, which the authors called of “debatable”.
The researchers said promoting snacking habits as a way to help babies eat on their own has the potential to encourage overeating and obesity later in life.
Overall, they argued that the widespread use of unregulated claims on manufactured baby foods was of concern.
In particular, they highlighted the use of the term “vegetable taste” on certain products which, in reality, were composed of a combination of fruits and vegetables with a predominantly sweet taste.
The study’s lead author, Dr Ada Garcia, said influencing food preferences early in life could have long-term health consequences for babies.
“Given that food preferences are formed early in life and infants have an innate preference for sweet and savory foods, promoting sweet baby foods with high amounts of sugar could be detrimental,” he said. she declared.
She said the findings indicate that more should be done to regulate claims made on packaging, which could mislead parents vulnerable to such suggestions as they seek to give their baby a healthy start in life. .
“Promotional claims on packaging are widely used, which could mislead parents,” she said.
“The unrestricted use of health halo messages and statements on packaging calls on policy makers and stakeholders to update guidelines, legislation and policies aimed at protecting this vulnerable demographic so that recommendations on infant feeding are not undermined.”
Government plans new restrictions on junk food advertising from April this year in a bid to tackle childhood obesity
Part of those measures include banning junk food ads online and before 9 p.m. on TV.
Obesity is a growing problem, in both the UK and the US, up to a third of young people are considered overweight.